1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the course of investigation, LPA interviewed 4 staff members, and 3 parents. No child interview were conducted due to being non-verbal.
During the staff interviews, LPA inquired about the procedure for allergies. Staff 1 (S1) demonstrated in one of the preschool rooms there was a list in the classroom that stated children with allergies. LPA asked if there was a list in the infant room. S1 stated none of the infants had any allergies. When LPA asked S1 about the infant allergy S1 stated S1 was unaware. Staff 2 stated one of the older infants has an allergy and they don’t give that child what they are allergic to. S3 stated one infant has an allergy, S3 stated they separate that child to ensure they don’t eat what they are allergic to. S4 stated the same child has an allergy and staff make sure the child doesn’t eat what they can’t have. 4 out of 4 staff failed to identify the second child that has an allergy. S2, S3 and S4 disclosed that children have drunk another child’s bottle and/or eaten another child’s food.
On 5/22/23 LPA Valdez Santana observed at least 2 bottles out of about 6-8 bottles sitting out that without a name label. LPA reminded Director/owner that all bottles need to be labeled with the child's name to ensure they are not giving the wrong bottle to any child. LPA did not observe an "Allergy list: posted in the infant classroom. Director showed LPA the "allergy list" posted in one of the preschool classrooms. When LPA asked Director why there was not one in the infant room, Director stated there was no one with allergies. LPA had reviewed 10 children's files and at least one child had an allergy, and it was not posted. Director said she was not aware that they had that allergy.
LPA observed at least 3 occasions where an infant took another infants food and ate it, S1 and S3 had no idea the incidents occurred because they were doing other things.
3 of 5 parents were interviewed, parents had no issues or concerns with the daycare.
Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1 Section 101227(7)(B) Food Services and 101229(a) Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Please refer to attached 9099D for documentation of deficiencies.
Page 2 of 3. |