1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (page 2)
LPA interviewed several parents on 4/19/21 and 5/4/21. Parents stated that they were not witness to any issues at the facility nor had any concerns, and had generally positive responses for their experience with the facility. LPA also interviewed children on 3/24/21. From the information obtained from the children interviews, it was not determined that the facility had violated the personal rights of children, nor supervision regulations related to the allegations. From these interviews, there was insufficient information to create a preponderance of evidence to support either of these allegations.
On 4/7/21, LPA interviewed the reporting party and child #1. Details of the allegation were obtained, and LPA discussed with reporting party the investigation process and answered the reporting party's questions.
On 5/5/2021, LPA Valencia reviewed footage of a classroom at the center, where the allegations may have taken place. A total of 14 hours of in classroom time was reviewed by LPA over the course of six weeks of footage of the classroom, and observed that the staff and facility was in compliance of personal rights and supervision regulations.
Based on all this information the preponderance of evidence standard for these two allegations was not met, therefore the above allegations are found to be unsubstantiated. From all of the available information obtained by LPA during the course of the investigation, that there is insufficient evidence indicating that a day care child was left unattended or staff used Inappropriate discipline. Based on all of the information LPA was able to obtain LPA was not able to determine that these allegations were false or untrue. Therefore, LPA cannot make the determination that these two allegations are unfounded and the most accurate finding, based on the information obtained during the investigation, would remain at unsubstantiated.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur; therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted, and report was reviewed and discussed. Notice of Site Visit was posted during the visit. The facility representative was informed that the Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100 per day. The licensee was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058 12/15) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. |