1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | staffing on the playground, but none of the staff saw C1 get injured. Additionally, interviews with all parties involved revealed that no one knew when the alleged injury occurred, which is why an Ouch Report was never generated. Based on the information obtained during this investigation through interviews conducted, the review of C1’s file, and after receiving conflicting information, LPA cannot determine if C1’s injury was sustained while in care at the facility. Therefore, based on the information gathered, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
In regards to the allegation staff did not safeguard residents’ belongings, interviews revealed that on the day that the said item was not safeguarded, the classroom had a substitute teacher who was not familiar with the classroom and were things are kept. The item was not lost, as it was on the shelf where those items are kept but was on the bottom shelf. The Director located the item on the bottom of the shelf 1-2 minutes after C1’s parent picked the child up from the facility and was provided to C1’s parents the following day. Based on the information obtained during this investigation through the interviews conducted and after receiving conflicting information, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report was reviewed with the Director, Linda Williamson and a copy of this report was provided.
Appeal rights were discussed and provided during the exit interview.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. |