1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LIC9099C Unsubstantiated Page 2 - Personal Rights Continued:
Interviews with pertinent parties alleged that a preschool staff spanked a subject child in care, however the alleged staff was not identified by the pertinent party interviewed. In addition, a pertinent party interviewed stated a subject child described in motion how staff spanked a child, however the child did not identify the staff by name. Additional pertinent parties interviewed by the LPA did not corroborate the allegation that facility staff spanked a subject child and/or spank other children in care. Other pertinent parties interviewed denied witnessing or having knowledge of children being spanked while in care or that inappropriate forms of discipline towards children take place at the facility.
The LPA was unable to interview a subject child or other parties relevant to the allegation. The facility does not have cameras to review video content of activities for the alleged time frame. During the investigation the LPA did not observe any inappropriate forms of discipline by staff towards children and no evidence was obtained to indicate a staff spanked a subject child or that staff spank other children while in care. Further information gathered during the investigation by the LPA S. Brewer, indicate the details of the alleged act were inconsistent. Therefore based on conflicting evidence gathered, the allegation was determined to be Unsubstantiated.
Although the allegation that the facility staff spanked a child in care may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation/s did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No citations were issued.
No civil penalties were issued.
Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the Director IvaMae Haney, on this date.
A notice of site was given and will need be posted for the next 30 days. |