1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Staff immediately physically separated the children, talked to and verbally redirected the children (biter) behaviors, provided first aid to the child who was bitten. Staff notified children’s representatives. As an extra precaution on or about December 1, 2020, the director discussed intervention and or alternative placement of the child who was the biter, if the biting persisted.
LPA Robinson observed an incident report dated November 30, 2020, the incident report outline how a child was bitten by another child in care at the facility. LPA learned the facility’s policy regarding biting is as follows; “…children who bite are separated from the group and the child who has been injured is provided first aid. Staff assist children with the social learning process by supplying language in redirecting behavior and working with the parents of the biter. Children who are persistent biters who cannot be successfully redirected or intercepted, are required by the facility to return home for the remainder of the day, in order to protect other children in care. Staff provide incident reports to children's parents. A conference was held with the parent to discuss intervention at home and or possible alternative placement.” According to information obtained, the facility took appropriate actions in addressing the biting incident.
LPA learned despite the child being bitten by another child, the child likes going to the facility and has not expressed any fear surrounding the child or the facility. The biting incident was observed by staff, although unfortunately staff were unable to prevent the bite due to the speed of the “biter”, and finally the biting incident was prompted by age appropriate behavior and or lack of language skills. Medical attention was not required for the bite, as the skin was observed not to be broken. Thus, based on interviews, documentation obtained, and LPA’s virtual observations, although the incident occurred; there is not enough evidence that supports a personal rights violation was established from the child’s perspective.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove a personal rights violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
LPA Robinson provided the Director with a copy of this report and notice of site visit via email with an electronic “read receipt”. LPA asked the Director to acknowledge receipt of the email. The electronic read receipt of the emailed report acknowledges receipt of this report and notice of site visit. A copy of this report and notice of site visit was emailed to the Director during this Tele-inspection on January 15, 2021. No deficiencies cited at this time. Director advised the notice of site visit must be posted in a prominent location for the next 30 days. |