1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | According to the map, the subject child’s cot is positioned midway back from the front doorway which is conflicting from what the allegation states. LPA’s interview with subject child stated they nap in the back side of the classroom pointing to the far-left area of the classroom making the allegation conflicting as well. In addition, the LPA toured the facility at nap time where the allegation took place and the door to the classroom was closed and none of the children were napping near the door entry, which also conflicts with the allegation.
Based on the information obtained during the course of the investigation, It was concluded that there is not enough evidence to collaborate that a violation of CCL regulations occurred. Although the allegation may have happened, or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to current, Office Assistant, Amaris Moya.
A Notice of Site Visit was also provided and posted which must stay posted for 30 days.
THIS REPORT MUST BE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC, UPON THEIR REQUEST, FOR THREE YEARS. |