1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) James Wilkerson arrived at this facility to conduct in investigation into the above allegation. LPA met with licensee, Marta Sheehan, toured the facility and conducted census. LPA conducted an interview with the licensee, took photos of facility documents, and obtained a copy of a police report. It was alleged that a child had received a rash due to an allergic reaction at this facility. LPA reviewed the child's file and there is no mention of the child having any allergies. LPA received copies of text message and photos of the child. The rash may have not been caused by an allergy. LPA cannot prove that the child received a rash due to any circumstances happening at this facility and cannot prove the child did not receive a rash from any circumstantces happening at this facility. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the allegation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted, appeal rights discussed and provided along with a copy of this report to Ms. Sheehan on this date. A Notice of Site Visit was posted. |