1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the investigation conducted by investigator Williams, inappropriate touching was denied, and sexual abuse was not disclosed. Information obtained indicates that the licensee and legal guardian(s) did not communicated and/or discussed concern(s) regarding the alleged incident(s) that made a child (ren) feel uncomfortable due to the inappropriate behavior of a male adult who interacted with the daycare children at the facility. Pertinent parties related to this investigation stated that they have observed the adult male assisting daycare children with activities and toileting needs. Licensee stated that children have always been observed by the licensee and/or assistant playing together and showing signs of affection, but not in an appropriate or sexual nature.
There is conflicting information on whether the sexual abuse allegation occurred since the evidence collected during this investigation was not sufficient to substantiate the allegation. Therefore, due to conflicting information found throughout this investigation by Investigator Vasquez and LPA Ruiz, it cannot be determined whether the sexual abuse of a child(ren) did or did not occur at the facility. The department has determined that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was given to the licensees. Licensee understands that a copy of this report must be made available to the public, upon their request, for the next three years. A Notice of Site Visit was issued, and it was verified posted in a prominent location at the facility before ending the inspection. Licensee understands that the Notice of Site Visit must remain posted for the next 30 days. No deficiencies were cited during this inspection.
|