1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | C1 simply didn’t want to go inside. Interviews revealed that C1 may have inadvertently swiped at S1 while physically expressing disappointment. LPA Sanchez was informed that C1 is non-verbal, therefore was unable to interview. LPA Sanchez reviewed video recording of the incident, which showed S1 immediately behind C1, with fingers wrapped around C1’s upper arms while C1’s arms were hanging horizontal to the ground (forming a “T” shape). At one point while S1 was walking C1 towards a door, C1’s legs started dragging. S1 stopped and continued walking C1 once C1 stood again, with fingers still wrapped around C1’s upper arms.
Based on record review and confidential interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report was reviewed with Director Cynthia Rosa. Appeal rights were discussed and provided during the exit interview.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. |