1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2.
The Licensee’s interview revealed that the child was hurt with the door, which could have caused the child’s bruise on the forehead. The Licensee stated, she informed the child’s mother about the marking on the child’s forehead but was unable to explain the bruise on the child’s back. Licensee stated she does not take off the children’s clothes to check for markings or bruising on children’s backs. Licensee also stated she did not observe the children fighting or playing rough, therefore she was unable to explain the bruise on the child’s back. Licensee’s assistant was also interviewed, Assistant disclosed they accidentally hit the child on the forehead after entering the facility’s main entrance, the door hit the child when the child was “standing behind the door” upon entry. Children interviews were also conducted, there were no disclosures. LPA Corral interviewed the child’s representative and the subject child. During interviews, the child confirmed being hit by the Assistant with the door on the forehead.
LPA investigated the above allegations and gathered evidence surrounding the allegations. Throughout this investigation, LPA Corral conducted interviews, reviewed facility records, and conducted facility observations. Based on the information obtained throughout the investigation there is insufficient evidence to corroborate that a child sustained unexplained injuries while in care and/or that the child was hit with an object, other than “accidentally” being hit by the facility’s door. The interviews revealed that the Licensee did inform the child’s representative about the bruise on the forehead. One of the child’s bruises was explained while the other bruise was unable to be explained due to Licensee not being aware of it. The bruise that was observed on the child’s forehead was explained. However, the Licensee was unaware of the bruise on the child’s back, she indicated she did not observe the child being hurt while in the facility’s care.
The facility provided a plausible explanation as to how the bruise on the child’s forehead, may have happened. Due to conflicting information, the department is unable to determine whether or not, the back bruise occurred while in care. LPA Corral requested pictures of the bruise(s) but photos were not provided. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the allegations did or did not occur as alleged, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
Exit interview was conducted and Complaint Report was reviewed with Licensee, Kimberly Daniel. A Notice of Site Visit was provided, Licensee was reminded it must remain posted for 30 days.
End of Report. |