1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | C1 did not want to line-up to go outside for play time and was ignoring T1’s directions to join the line. T1 approached C1 to help her line-up by taking C1’s hand, but C1 began to drop herself to the floor. In the video, T1 can be seen picking up C1 under her arm pits to stand up. There was no mishandling of C1 that could be observed. T1’s hands were never near the victim’s neck where P1 said they observed scratches. Interviews revealed that after this interaction, the children went outside to play. There were two other staff members and T1 who were supervising outdoor play. During this time, staff 1 and 2 never observed T1 have any physical interactions with C1. However, the staff did witness C1 laying and rolling on the grass and suspect that is how the scratches on C1’s neck occurred. T1 denied having scratched C1’s neck and stated that she never mishandled nor hurt C1 nor did anything that was inappropriate.
There is no evidence or indication that T1 caused the scratches on C1’s neck, but at the same time the evidence does not reveal exactly how the scratches occurred. Therefore, the finding is determined to be unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited at this time. An exit interview was conducted with the Director and the Licensee Appeal Rights were provided. A Notice of Site Visit was posted by LPA and this shall be posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. |