1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Christopher Bello conducted a Tele-inspection via FaceTime with the licensee of the facility to close a complaint investigation. LPA met with licensee Mai Vang, also present was licensee’s fiancée. LPA observed two children at time of tele-inspection. There was a conduct inimical allegation regarding an adult in the home having inappropriate interactions with a child that was not in care. During the investigation LPA made observations and gathered documents pertaining to the investigation. Licensee stated she does not believe that it occurred and that it was a ridiculous accusation. Further investigation was conducted by Investigator Shannan Borton. Interviews conducted did not corroborate the allegation. Based on Investigator Borton’s investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met and although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated
There were no Title 22 deficiencies during today’s investigation. An exit interview was conducted and a Notice of Site Visit will be mailed to the licensee to post for 30 days.
|