1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation 1: the first allegation stated that the facility is operating beyond the terms of the license. During the investigation, it was revealed that Child 1 had recently enrolled in the facility and there was a question to the age of the child when they started at the facility. After conducting interviews and reviewing records, Parent 1 stated that Child 1 started on a date after Child 1’s second birthday and the provided information supports that Child 1 enrolled after their second birthday and was eligible to be enrolled into the facility while they were present and attending the facility. After reviewing all the relevant information obtained, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to support the allegation.
Allegation 4: the fourth allegation stated that the facility operated out of ratio. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, record review, and observations of relevant complaint documents including sign-in sheets, timesheets, and other documents. There was no supporting evidence that the facility operated out of ratio during the timeframe reported in the preschool classrooms. After reviewing the relevant information obtained, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to support the allegation.
After observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that there was insufficient evidence that the facility operated beyond the terms of its license and that it operated out of ratio. The allegations could not be corroborated with the evidence found during the investigation. Therefore, the allegations have been found unsubstantiated. Although, the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the facility operated in violation of policy in this circumstance.
An exit interview was conducted via telephone, a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to the Licensee via email, regular, and certified mail.
|