1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA addressed the above allegation with facility staff and interviewed children in attendance. Licensee and staff state adequate supervision is always provided at the facility. Licensee stated in the past, the facility has addressed issues to parents/guardians regarding children playing rough and/or placing hands on each other. Licensee denies all allegations of inappropriate touching during nap time occurring. Interviews conducted with the children in care did not indicate any isolated incidents of lack of supervision or children engaging in inappropriate behavior/touching at the facility during nap time.
Based on the information provided during this investigation, it cannot be determined whether a child was touched by another child inappropriately due to lack of supervision. The evidence collected was not enough to substantiate or refute the above allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
The following was alleged: Staff pulling children's ears and staff hit child with book. LPA investigated the allegation and gathered the following information:
LPA addressed the above allegation with facility staff and interviewed children in attendance. Facility staff deny ever pulling children’s ears or throwing books/objects at children. Interviews with children in care did not support the allegations of ear pulling and books/objects being thrown at children. Children and staff both stated the facility utilizes time outs to correct behavioral issues. A time out consists of separating a child from others and having them stand against the wall/corner for a short duration of time. LPA was not provided any specific dates or times to support the above allegation.
The evidence collected was not enough to substantiate or refute the above allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted, LPA provided Licensee, Gary Johnson with a copy of this report on 06/11/2021
A NOTICE OF SITE VISIT WAS ISSUED AND LPA VERIFIED THAT IT WAS POSTED IN A PROMINENT LOCATION AT THE FACILITY BEFORE LEAVING. THE LICENSEE UNDERSTANDS THAT IT MUST REMAIN POSTED FOR THE NEXT 30 DAYS.
|