1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Staff #1 through #3 were interviewed. Staff interviews revealed that staff do not restrain children. When children are acting out, the procedure is to use redirection and try to refocus the child's attention. If that does not work, staff are instructed to contact management for assistance. All staff interviewed denied restraining or witnessing any children being restrained. However, it was disclosed that due to child #1s aggressive behavior, physical intervention to prevent harm to child #1 or to others has been necessary, on occasion. In this case, the physical intervention used was to take child #1 by the hands in an attempt to get the child to refocus, or to prevent the child from harming self or causing harm to others. The holding of child #1s hands was not done with malicious intent and was necessary for the safety of all.
Based on the information obtained during this investigation, it has been determined that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Due to COVID-19 State of Emergency, LPA conducted an exit interview via Microsoft Teams and provided an email copy of this report to the Director. LPA Zeigler requested the Director to acknowledge receipt of the report by replying to the sent email. The electronic response from the Director, will serve as the read receipt of the emailed report. Director McGuire understands that a copy of this report must be made available to the public, upon their request, for the next three years. Appeal Rights were provided and LPA issued a Notice of Site Visit and verified it was posted in a prominent location at the facility before ending the tele-inspection. |