1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | C1 was observed to be washing their hands normally, pulling on a paper towel, and using their hands throughout the day without any apparent discomfort or indication of being hurt, which lead staff to believe there was no serious injury that would require an immediate report to the parents. A review of the medical records indicated that on the day of the incident, C1 was initially diagnosed with a “likely contusion” (bruise). Two days later, C1 was seen by an orthopedic doctor and diagnosed C1 with a “new upper extremity fracture.” Information obtained from staff confirmed that appropriate ratio and supervision was provided during the incident.
It was also alleged that staff did not safeguard C1’s personal belongings. Based on interviews with staff, reporting party and a review of the child’s record, it was determined that there were no clear instructions provided for staff to safeguard C1’s belongings.
Regarding the child being hit/bullied by other children, the staff and children interviews revealed that there was no indication or concern of children being bullied or hit by other children without staff addressing the behavior appropriately.
With regard to the child not being provided sufficient food, staff and parent interviews confirmed that the parents/guardians provide their own child(ren)’s food while in care. The child in question brought their own meals which according to multiple staff, were often too much for a child to eat in its entirety. Information obtained from staff also indicated that they strongly encourage the children to eat their food and they cannot force the children to eat if they don’t want to eat everything the parents provide. Parent interviews indicated that they did not have any concern relating to their children not eating enough while in care.
Finally, the majority of parents interviewed stated that they had no concern related to the overall care and supervision that the staff provide to their child(ren).
Based on the all the information obtained throughout the investigation regarding the above allegations, the Department found the allegations to all be unsubstantiated. Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that any of alleged violations occurred. Exit interview was conducted with Co-Director. Notice of Site Visit was provided at conclusion of visit and is to be posted for 30 days. |