1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | LPA, Luigi Gargaro, conducted a follow up complaint visit to the facility regarding the above allegation. During the course of the investigation, analyst conducted interviews with the facility site supervisor, staff members and children in care.
Based on the testimony received, analyst found that while child #1 was at times behaving in a manner that did cause interruptions in the classroom, analyst could not definitively prove or disprove that the child's behavior may have violated any other child's personal rights or that the facility engendered any incidents due to improper supervision. Site supervisor also provided analyst with strategies that were put in place to assist the child and improve some of the previously witnessed behaviors.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Appeal Rights (1/16) were discussed and provided. Signature at the bottom of this report confirms receipt. Notice of Site Visit was posted during this visit and will remain posted for 30 days.
|