1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | was standing outside the classroom door, supervising children entering the playground from the classroom door, receiving a bottle from the staff inside, and maintaining visual supervision of the child on the playground. One (1) staff stated it is a routine procedure that staff stand at the door for a few minutes while on the playground, receiving equipment or feeding items from inside, while always maintaining visual supervision. Parents stated they have no concerns with supervision by facility staff and expressed a high level of satisfaction to the care their children receive. LPA toured the playground and determined that it is possible for facility staff standing in the classroom threshold to be concealed behind the classroom door from individuals entering through the playground gate.
Due to a lack of witnesses to the incident and conflicting information obtained throughout the course of the investigation, LPA was unable to determine whether or not the allegation occurred. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation is UNSUBSTAINIATED.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Owner, Howard Wu. A copy of this report, along with Appeal Rights (LIC9058), were provided. A Notice of Site Visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. LPA observed that the Notice of Site Visit was posted during the inspection. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. |