1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | While acknowledging that her tone may seem firm, she clarified that she does not yell at the children. Additional staff interviewed, denied the allegations stating that S1 has not been observed handling nor speaking to daycare children inappropriately. Facility director reported that C6 had a history of self-inflicting injuries. The five (5) daycare children interviewed expressed an affinity for S1, with most describing her as “nice”.C6 and C7 were not interviewed due to their nonverbal status. Daycare parents interviewed did not disclose any concerns or issues with the S1’s interactions with daycare children.
It was also alleged that staff (S1) did not ensure daycare child (C6) was adequately fed, which resulted in C6 returning home hungry on multiple occasions. S1 denied the allegation but acknowledged that C6 would occasionally decline to eat. S1 explained that she had tried to encourage C6 to eat by sitting with her; however, S1 stated staff can’t “force” children to eat. According to staff, the facility has set mealtimes from 8:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., from 11:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m., and from 2:30 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. Staff explained that mealtimes cannot be changed and that meal modifications require a doctor’s note. The five (5) daycare children interviewed did not express any concerns regarding meals or ever going hungry. C6 was not interviewed, as they are nonverbal.
Due to conflicting information obtained throughout the course of the investigation and no other witnesses to the alleged incidents, LPA was unable to determine whether or not the allegations occurred. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview was conducted and the report was reviewed with Director, Charmaine Deegan. A notice of Site Visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days.
.
|