1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | On 10/22/19 at 12:50 P.M., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Van conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation and met with director, Sheran Lo. LPA explained the purpose of the inspection and was granted entry to the facility by the director. Present there are 33 infants and 14 teachers. Facility is operating within teachers/children ratio.
LPA and director inspected the facility for health and safety hazards. As part of this complaint investigation, complainant, teachers, and director were interviewed; records and relevant information were reviewed. On the first allegation where facility is operating out of ratio, LPA received conflicting information from teachers and complainant during the interview. Based on interview, teachers were aware of the infant/teacher ratio requirements. Teachers mentioned they would be communicating with other teachers and seeking help when they are out of ratio. In addition, teachers’ schedules revealed that facility had more than sufficient teachers to infants’ ratio.
On the second allegation where infants were given food to which they were allergic to, LPA found that there was a mistake made by the third-party food delivery company Chefables. Teachers’ interview revealed that normally C1 and C2 would receive a separate container when the food contains dairy product, and when there are no separate containers the food does not contain dairy product and it was okay for the children to consume. Information obtained confirm that on that particular day Chefables did not have any separate food for the children, and the primary teacher followed the school protocols and gave the food to the children. Moving forward, director stated she had requested Chefables to provide a monthly menu with ingredients as a preventable measure to avoid incident like this from occur again.
This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that the facility is operating out of ratio and infants were given food to which they were allergic to. Based on the information obtained, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with director. This report, and rights to comment were discussed with director. This report must be available in the facility for public review. Notice of site visit shall be posted for 30 days from today's visit.
|