1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) Charlotte Baney and Chris Jackson met with licensee to provide the finding for the above allegations. During the investigation LPA conducted interviews, made observations and reviewed information. The complainant alleged adult in the home inappropriately interacted with day care child and that facility smelled like smoke. Based on the conflicting information obtained throughout the course of this investigation the above allegations could not be substantiated or dismissed. Although the allegations may have happened (or is valid), there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the finding is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Based on interviews, observations, documentation, and other information gathered, there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove or negate the allegation, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
No Title 22 deficiencies were cited at time of visit. An exit interview was conducted in which the report was reviewed and discussed with licensee. Appeal rights were discussed, and a printed version was given to licensee.
|