1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Although Licensee stated S2 was not left alone to supervise children in care, LPA received conflicting statements regarding S2 and was unable to determine if S2 was providing care and/or left alone to supervise children in care. Based on conflicting statements about S2, the allegation was found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
It was also alleged that a child was injured in care, due to a lack of supervision. Based on the information obtained throughout the course of the investigation, LPA was unable to determine whether there was a lack of supervision which resulted in a child being injured. Given the severity of the injury, the Department felt that the allegation could not be dismissed, therefore the allegation was found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
LPA Hunter determined that the complaint was found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted with the Licensee. Appeal rights were printed and provided. Notice of Site Visit was provided and must remain posted for 30 days. |