1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It was alleged that “Licensee’s conduct poses a threat to daycare children in care due to the effects of her drug use.” Throughout the investigation, investigator, Sergio Guerra of Investigations Branch (IB) conducted the investigation and interviewed with Reporting Party (RP), licensee’s former facility staff, childcare parents, and childcare child. A police report from Lodi Police Department was also obtained. The interviews produced conflicting information. One individual stated that it was “Hearsay” in regard to licensee’s drug and/or substance abuse problems. Other individuals stated they were aware of licensee being under the influence of drugs; however, none of them had observed her using drugs. Based on lack of corroborating information, the Department is unable to determine whether licensee did or did not pose a threat to daycare children in care because she used drugs.
Based on interviews obtained from the investigations of IB, LPA David Nguyen determined that the complaint allegation was found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur at the facility.
Both copy of this report and appeal rights were provided and enclosed in the U.S. certified mail and via email. |