1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 | On 4/17/23, at 12:01 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elvin Baddley made an unannounced Case Management Inspection (Deficiencies) at the abovementioned Child Care Center (CCC). LPA met with Rhonda Todd, the Head Teacher of the CCC and explained the nature of the inspection. LPA notes 34 children are present during the Inspection.
The Case Management Inspection is to address children previously in care, C1 and C2, being disenrolled from the CCC following an incident which occurred on or about 1/17/23, where C3 tried to place a hand down the back of C1’s pants into the underwear while children played in the CCC’s playground area. The incident was witnessed by C2. The Authorized Representative of C1 and C2, herein P1, contacted the CCC and informed of the incident. Further, P1 informed CCC staff C1 and C2 would be held out of the CCC until staff members were about to create a setting where C1 and C2 would not be inappropriately touched by C3 and/or C3 was no longer attending the CCC. The incident was brought to the attention of CCLD in the form of a complaint. Additionally, P1 posted an unfavorable review concerning the CCC on a local website (Yelp).
P1 and the children's other parent met with the CCC Administration following the incident. Factors to mitigate C3's inappropriate contact with C1 and C2 was not fully addressed or explored. C3 also remained enrolled in the CCC. The CCC's Administration informed P1 C1 and C2’s enrollment had ceased, and spaces previously held by C1 and C2 at the CCC had been filled by other children. In essence, C1 and C2 could no longer attend the CCC. The fact that P1 had filed a complaint was also discussed during the meeting.
The CCC’s Admission Agreement notes parents of child in care are to provide at least 30 days written notice before withdrawing their children from the CCC. Written notices was not given by the parents of C1 and C2, however the children were disenrolled from the CCC. Further, tuition was current for the children. P1 wanted C1 and C2 to remain in the CCC and the Administration of the facility to attempt to create an action plan and environment which lessened the likelihood of C3 being aggressive towards C1 or C2. It should be noted
(CONT. LIC 809-C) |