1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPAs Mendez and Gifford conducted interviews with five staff (S1-S5) on 8/29/2023. All staff interviews conducted denied the allegation of staff not preventing a child from injuring another child. Staff interviews were consistent in stating that there is a plan in place for zoning and supervising and that the children are constantly supervised.
LPA Gifford interviewed eight parents (P1-P4) on 9/5/2023 and (P5-P8) on 9/22/2023. All parent interviews were consistent in stating there are no concerns about safety or supervision of the children in care.
LPA Gifford interviewed three children (C2-C3) on 8/25/2023 and 9/22/2023. There are no concerns with the care and supervision the children are receiving. During the interview with C1 on 9/22/2023, C1 admitted to scratching C2.
Based on the information obtained, LPA Julie Gifford could not determine staff did not prevent the child from injuring another child, specifically a child scratching another child.
Therefore, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and appeal rights were provided.
The Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 days. |