1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The LPA finds the nature of the scent to be subjective and the witnesses interviewed only confirmed trace odors when the children were in there and did not feel this was a concern since the gas was off and the doors were open. Interviews were conducted with 9 staff 2 children and 2 parents that were present during the incident who did not corroborate the allegation.
The LPA toured the facility with Ms. Wilson on 10/11/19 to investigate the allegations that S -1 violated a child’s rights; specifically, by calling the child a liar and referring to the child as a brat. The Director told the LPA that she does not believe S-1 would violate a child’s rights in this way and would never call a child names. The witness named as having been present denied this allegation and had a different version of the events. The witness stated that S#1 would never do that, and that she hears what goes on in the classroom. S#1 was interviewed, she recalled the incident but denied that she would ever refer to children using names. The LPA did not observe any personal rights violation during the visit. Interviews were conducted with 9 staff and 2 children and 2 parents. A copy of the roster and sign in/out sheets were received.
Based on available information at this time, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. This report was reviewed and discussed with the licensee. Appeal Rights were provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 days from today’s visit. |