1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The LPA observed two staff supervising 8 children at 1:45pm on 5/21/19 and one of the children was still napping, no forced napping and no observed discipline. On 7/25/19 there is a new class of children and the LPA observed 3 staff caring for 14 children with no observed discipline.
The LPA interviewed 5 children and 3 staff on 5/21/19 and none corroborated the allegation. The parent of Child #1 refused to have their child interviewed. The LPAs did not observe any forced naps, isolation or child behaviors during the 5/21/19 or the 7/25/19 inspections. A copy of the roster and pertinent documents from the Child #1’s file were received along with documentation from the other children's files. Child's#1s file contained information regarding “planned ignore” of negative behaviors and praise of positive behaviors; there were 4 other children in the class with this plan. There was documentation in the Child #1’s file showed that the parent had signed the "planned ignore" policy. The staff stated that they would comfort children as needed until the child displayed dangerous behavior (climbing, jumping, throwing items, scratching staff) at which point they would move child to a safe location and monitor for safety until the child calmed and began responding. The LPA reviewed the behavior plans and determined the plan was followed and there was no evidence of isolation, forced naps or withholding comfort.
Based on available information at this time, although the allegation that inappropriate discipline was used may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation of isolation and forced naps did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. This report was reviewed and discussed with the licensee. Appeal Rights were provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 days from today’s visit. |