1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | AD claimed that the toddler classroom does not have highchairs, and the available highchairs in the Infant classroom had adjustable straps to safely secure a child. AD further claimed that C1 did not get injured as a result of a lack of supervision. S1 stated that she secured C1 in a highchair that was low to the ground, that the highchair has seat belts with three points straps that go in between a child’s legs and hip; and there was enough room for staff to put her hand through so the seat belt was not tight. S1 claimed to know how to properly fasten highchair seats and that C1 was always secured when in the chair. Also, there were no reports of any prior incidents where C1 fell off or bumped C1’s head on the chair.
Statement accounts provided by parents (P2 and P3) did not indicate that parents witnessed any incident(s) that resulted in C1 sustaining unexplained injuries and parents did not report that their child had sustained injuries which caused concern. Although P3 reportedly saw a visible, pinkish colored, rock size bump on P3 child’s head, staff had provided P3 with a written document and an explanation of how the injury occurred. Parents statements did not provide evidence to support the allegation that C1 sustained unexplained injuries while in care. During LPA’s inspection of the Infant and toddler classroom, respectively on 06/22/20 at 12:07pm and 12:09pm, LPA observed S1 supervising three children napping on cots and one staff supervising two children napping in cribs, and LPA did not observe any hazards or unusual incidents that resulted in any child(ren) getting injured.
Based on the LPA’s investigation, there is not enough evidence to support the allegation that C1 sustained unexplained injuries while in care, and therefore the above allegation is found to be unsubstantiated. CD’s signature was not recorded on this Complaint Investigation Report (CIR), however; CD was provided with a copy of this CIR, and CD’s confirmation of read receipt is on file. LPA conducted an exit interview with CD. There were no Title 22 deficiencies cited during today’s inspection. Appeal Rights were provided. |