1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | CD’s statement did not provide evidence to support claims concerning a lack of supervision resulting in inappropriate interactions between children or that staff did not notify parent(s) of an incident. According to CD, the facility was currently experiencing a staffing shortage, but CD felt the staffing shortage did not have any impact on staff’s ability to provide adequate supervision. CD stated C1 had not been involved in a fight, however; CD did report that within the last two weeks during lunch time in the Discovery Preschool (DP), another child (C2) bit C1 on the right arm while C1 was sitting at the table for lunch, but the parents of the children involved in the incident were notified and provided with a written incident reports on that same day. CD stated at the time of the incident, S1 and S2 were present and in proximity to the children but could not intervene in time to prevent C1 from being bit. CD further stated that if staff noticed a child was about to hit their friend(s), staff would intervene or intercept to disrupt that undesired behavior.
Multiple statements provided by S1-S5 indicated staff only had knowledge pertaining to the bite incident and staff further reported there had not been any fights between children or that child(ren) did not fall off or get injured on the play equipment. S3, S4 & S5 felt there was not a supervision issue at the facility and staff provided constant supervision by actively walking and scanning the children’s play areas, but staff also felt that the facility was inadequately staff and additional support was needed. It was further acknowledged that some staff are on their phones at times, but it does not negatively impact supervision.
Staff reported they were required to notify facility management of incidents involving children, as well as produce a written incident report which was later provided to that child’s parent(s). S4’s statement noted sometimes shift changes between staff resulted in mis-communication, or staff not knowing about an incident to report it. P1, P2, P3 & P4 statements did not notate any concerns of how staff provided supervision and reported they were notified of incident(s) involving their child(ren) in a timely manner. They further stated that the facility notified parents of incidents verbally, via telephone, or provided a written incident report. On 10/11/22, the facility submitted six incident reports for six children ranging from 09/13/22 through 09/30/22, which documented one incident involving C1 being bitten on the right arm on 09/21/22. The facility reported they did not have any other reports which involved C1.
Based on LPA’s investigation, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the allegations occurred, therefore the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted, and report was reviewed with the Center Director, Donje Fields. Appeal rights were provided. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. |