1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC 9099.
During both the initial investigation inspection and subsequent investigation inspection, D1 denied the allegations and stated that, while children do sustain minor injuries in the course of normal play, staff provide visual supervision of all children at all times and document such injuries to inform parents. D1 also stated facility ensures staffing is sufficient to not only meet ratio requirements but also to ensure children receive constant visual supervision and attention to their needs. D1 stated children are fed when hungry, changed and/or toileted in a timely manner, and attended to when distressed or in need. D1 reported there is a comprehensive and adaptable plan for potty training and that staff work with parents to ensure the developmental needs of children in care are met during implementation of that potty training plan. D1 further stated no child is moved between age groups, such as from the infant to the preschool program, until the child is at the designated age for the program. D1 stated parents are always notified of an impending change in program. Subsequent to the initial investigation inspection, LPA reviewed facility documents. Beginning at 1:50 p.m. on 10/05/2020, LPA interviewed one witness (D1). Beginning at 8:43 a.m. on 12/09/2020, LPA interviewed four witnesses (A2, A3, S1, S3). LPA made multiple attempts to interview other witnesses on 10/05, 10/06, 10/07, 10/08, and 12/09/2020. Document review and witness statements failed to corroborate that a child sustained unexplained injuries, that staff was not able to meet the needs of children in care, that the facility does not have a plan in place for potty training, or that a child was placed in a different age group without notification of an authorized representative.
Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, although the allegations may have happened or be valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred; therefore, the allegations are unsubstantiated. Appeal rights were provided. This report was read and reviewed with D1, whose original signatures were not recorded on this report. D1 was provided with a copy of the LIC9099 Complaint Investigation Report (CIR) and Appeal Rights in an email dated 12/10/20 and confirmation of read receipt of the CIR is on file. All licensing reports are public information and must be made available upon request for at least three years. There were no Title 22 deficiencies cited during today's inspection. |