1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA interviewed licensee during this complaint opening on 12/14/2020. Licensee stated that on 12/08/2020 licensee was adequately supervising seven children (including C1 and C2) with two staff present, licensee and another staff (S1) during the time frame of said biting incident. On 12/08/2020 per licensee statement the facility was operating in compliance with capacity and ratio requirements. Per licensee on 12/08/20 during said incident C1 was in a crib and C2 was located on a napping mat with both in a facility napping room with other children there also. Per licensee, during said napping time staff were frequently supervising all children in said napping room by eyesight and hearing range and doing so within 15 minute intervals. During this time frame in question per licensee C1 was sound asleep and all children in the room were adequately spaced situated on their respective spaces. Licensee stated an additional supervision tool staff uses to supervise the facility is to monitor via video enabling staff to observe said napping area and various other locations throughout facility including the outside entryway. Per licensee, has thought since its believed the incident occurred while C1 was sleeping so C1 must have been too surprised at first just after getting bit to cry out. Licensee stated that nonetheless as soon as C1 cried out it was believed to be still very soon after C1 getting bit. As soon as licensee heard C1 crying out went immediately to check on C1. Licensee stated observing C2 with C1 inside said crib. Licensee next separated C1 and C2. Licensee next took all children out of this napping room except let C1 remain in napping to rest on the napping mat. Licensee stated observing multiple bite marks on back, arms, buttocks that per licensee appeared as “small” marks with no blood and some of the bites did break skin. Next per licensee staff contacted authorized representatives of C1 and C2 to report this incident. Licensee stated to LPA of having never observed any child climb into another child’s crib, so this incident was per licensee a surprise to licensee stating this incident with C2 going inside C1's crib was “spontaneous”. Per licensee, after said incident all the regular activities resumed including no notice from C1 of any lingering pains or issues.
On 12/14/2020 during LPA’s complaint inspection at approximately 10:32am licensee began presenting C1 who was attending that date during tele-inspection where it was facilitated by licensee where LPA did observed C1’s back was with two bite marks. One mark appeared to LPA as mouth-like-shaped and the other as like the one half of same above shape. LPA asked licensee if any remaining notable visible marks remain on body and per licensee none as such notable remain existing at time of this said tele-inspection.
Continued on next page... |