1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | CD further asserted she never encountered these issues or been accused of these allegations. The statement that S1 provided denied the allegations, and S1’s statement was consistent with that of CD.
On 01/28/21 through 01/29/21, LPA interviewed parents (P2-P3), children (C2-C4), staff (S2-S5), and three children did not qualify to interview. Statement accounts provided by parents, children and staff did not report any concerns of staff speaking inappropriately to child(ren), and/or staff discussing inappropriate topics or divulging any child(ren)’s personal information in the presence of children in care, staff or parents.
LPA conducted subsequent interviews with parents (P4-P6) on 02/01/21. Statements provided by parents did not indicate that parents witnessed or overheard staff speaking inappropriately to any child and/or staff discussed personal matters with C1 or any other child in care; and parent statements did not provide enough evidence to support the allegations. During LPA’s inspections on 07/20/20 and 01/29/21, LPA did not see or overheard any staff speaking inappropriately to any child in care and/or discussing or divulging personal matters to any child in the presence of other children in care.
Based on LPA’s investigation, there is not enough evidence to support the allegations, and therefore, the above allegations are found to be unsubstantiated. CD’s signature was not recorded on this Complaint Investigation Report (CIR), however; CD was provided with a copy of this CIR, and CD’s confirmation of read receipt is on file. LPA conducted an exit interview with CD. There were no Title 22 deficiencies cited during today’s inspection. Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 days. Appeal Rights were provided. |