1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (continued from page 1)
On 9/03/2021 LPA conducted interviews with four children (C3-C6) who were all in care at the same time as C1 and C2. None of the children interviewed witnessed or knew of the alleged incidents happening. All children were consistent in their statements regarding children’s activities and behavior at the home. One parent (P1) was interviewed by LPA on 9/03/2021 who was at the family child care home often and knew C1 and C2. P1 did not know of the alleged incidents happening and statements were consistent with others interviewed regarding behavior and activities at the home. P1 stated not having any concerns about the level of supervision by licensee or assistants at the home. On 11/18/2021 LPA conducted telephone interviews with C1 and C2. Both children stated the alleged incidents happened, and each said they witnessed what happened to the other. The children's authorized representative did not make contact with licensee at any time while the children were in care regarding these alleged incidents occurring or with any other concerns at the family child care home. Through all interviews conducted LPA was not able to determine that the alleged incidents occurred through a lack of supervision and that the authorized representative needed to be notified. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the allegation violations occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted.
The Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 days. |