1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The licensee stated that once their respective teachers arrive at the center, the school age children are then transitioned to their designated classroom. The licensee stated that this is done due to staffing difficulties and low child attendance early in the morning. The licensee stated that school age children are never commingled with the infants in care. The licensee stated that ratios for the preschool age group are followed when the two different age groups are commingled.
Interviews with facility staff were conducted during the investigation. Staff members S2-S5 were interviewed on 08/11/21 beginning at 02:06pm and S6 was interviewed on 08/18/21 at 12:23pm. Staff members that were interviewed corroborated the licensee’s statements. All staff members interviewed stated that they have never observed any commingling between school age children and infants.
During the initial investigation visit, a facility tour was provided by the licensee at 01:15pm. A subsequent inspection visit was made to the facility on 08/18/21 and a tour was provided by the licensee at 11:03am. The LPA did not observe any commingling of children between the different licenses. This is not a Title 5 facility. Therefore, commingling children between the different licenses is prohibited at this combination center.
Based on information obtained from interviews with the licensee, staff, and children, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, is being cited on the attached LIC 9099-D. Appeal rights were provided. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was read and discussed with the facility’s licensee, Penny Bowers. The Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 days.
|