1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 | A case management inspection visit was made to the facility by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Y. Yang in response to an incident that occurred at the center on 06/11/19 involving child C1 and child C2. The site supervisor (staff S1) reported that on 06/11/19, staff S2 observed C1 and C2 sitting astraddle on the playground's wood border. S1 reported that S2 observed child C2 place their foot between C1's crotch area.
Based off of information provided by S3 and using information gathered from the center's electronic record keeping log, there were 29 children being supervised by 4 teachers on the playground at the time of the incident. The assistant site supervisor (S3) reported that the incident occurred at approximately 11:00am on 06/11/19. It was reported that S1 and S3 were also on site at the time of the incident.
During an interview with S2 on 06/20/19 at 10:10am, S2 stated that she was returning to the playground after bringing several children inside the classroom to use the bathroom. S2 reported that when she opened the classroom door leading to the playground, she observed C1 and C2 sitting astraddle on the playground's border and observed C2's foot in C1's crotch area. S2 stated that she immediately told both children to "stop that." S2 stated that C2 stated "[C1] told me to." S2 stated that she spoke with both C1 and C2 and reminded both children that their bodies are private and to keep their hands and feet to themselves. S2 stated that C1 and C2 went on to play without further incidents that day. S2 stated that she reported the incident to S1 and S3. S1 reported that she then notified the 4Cs Program Director and the parents/guardians of C1 and C2. S1 reported that a follow-up parent meeting was scheduled to collaboratively discuss C1's behavior.
During today’s inspection, there were 30 children in care being supervised by five staff members. Children were observed to be directly supervised by staff while playing indoors and outdoors. This incident was reported to CCLD as required. Based on information available at this time, there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the incident involving C1 and C2 occurred due to a lack of supervision.
Continued on LIC 809-C |