1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA interviewed staff (S1-S2) on 9/22/23 and addressed the following allegation that child sustained an unexplained bruise while in care. S1 stated that C1 is constantly watched and stated that P1 was concerned over a visible red mark on C1’s arm. S1 stated as soon as an incident happens then they will write up an incident report and document when it happens, where it happened and explain how it happened and what they did to care for it or clean it if its a cut or scrape. When the parent comes in for pick then they will explain and sign off the incident report. S2 that no children have experienced any injuries. S2 stated that P1 had informed them that C1 had a red mark on their arm. S2 stated that C1 did not get the mark on their arm from school. S2 stated that the teacher usually completes the ouch report.
LPA interviewed parent (P1) on 9/21/23 and stated they noticed the bruise on C1’s left arm on 9/15/23 when P1 picked C1 from day-care. P1 stated that C1 attends King Ave Preschool part time from 8am-11am and then goes to daycare from 11:30am-4:30pm after preschool.
LPA interviewed children C1-C9 on 9/22/23 and 10/16/23, LPA was only able to interview 8 of 9 children. 8 of 8 children stated that they received a band aid when they get hurt. 4 of 8 children stated that they have witnessed their friends get hurt while playing outside.
During today’s visit facility was toured. LPA observed 20 children in care and 3 staff, facility was operating within the ratio.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted. The Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 days. |