1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Norma Lomeli and Pete Espinoza arrived at facility to conduct an unannounced complaint visit to close complaint. Met with Spanish-speaking Licensee, Raquel Sanchez and census taken. The complaint investigation finding is based on interviews and records review conducted by the Investigation Bureau.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore the allegation is/are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
As of January 1, 2017, the term “inconclusive” is no longer used to refer to the outcome of certain complaint investigations. Such complaint allegations are now deemed “unsubstantiated.” This document has not yet been updated to reflect this change and for purposes of this complaint investigation the Department’s finding is that this allegation was unsubstantiated.
Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 3, no deficiency is cited during today's inspection.
An exit interview conducted with Licensee, Raquel Sanchez. A copy of this report and Appeal Rights were provided and discussed with Ms. Sanchez
.
LPA observed licensee post the Notice of Site Visit Form on parent's board and understands it must remain posted for 30 days.
|