1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
29 
30 
31 
32  | Director admits a plan to have C1 picked up by 11 AM was verbally agreed by RP. Director stated this plan was placed in effect during the summer while pending the results of the assessment to have a better transition for C1. Director provided copies of text messages between RP and director, where RP expresses difficulty picking up child at the agreed time of 11 AM. It was also observed that RP asked director to keep C1 through nap so that the child can adapt to the routine as RP might not be able to pick up C1 at 11 AM starting January. It was determined that the center cooperated with RP’s request and have kept the child past 11 AM.  
 
During today's visit it was determined that the child is still enrolled and attending therapy based on the assessment results. The center has received a copy of the assessment, which LPA observed in child's records.  
 
Based on LPA’s observations, interviews which were conducted, documents gathered and record reviews, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiencies cited for today.  
 
 
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the Director, Brenda Orozco and a copy was left.  
The Notice of SITE VISIT MUST REMAIN POSTED FOR 30 DAYS OR A CIVIL PENALTY OF $100.00 WILL APPLY.   
 |