1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on staff interviews, there were two staff supervising 18 children at the time of the incident. Staff immediately provided comfort and an icepack to C1 and attempted to contact the parent. Facility and parent advised that C1 has a preexisting medical condition which increases the sensitivity in the eye area. Parent of C1 took the child to get medical treatment and the statements provided by the parent revealed that the physician was unable to determine if the resulting injury occurred as a result of the incident or if it was related to the medical condition. The facility is actively working with the child and parent to provide resources and identify solutions that promote the child’s success in the program.
Regarding the allegation that facility staff failed to notify appropriate parties of the incident, parent of C1 stated that she was verbally informed by staff of the prior incidents and facility records revealed that one of the incidents in question was documented. Staff advised when incidents happen, they are reported to parents either verbally, by telephone and/or written notice. Interview with the Site Supervisor revealed that the facility has procedures in place for when a child gets hurt. There was no incident report created for the two alleged incidents that occurred, but the parent was verbally informed given that the incidents did not result in an injury.
Parent interviews did not corroborate with the above allegations, but did corroborate with staff. Although the allegation(s) may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED.
|