1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | According the police report, the forensics proved no sexual assault. The report also indicated that a sexual assault examination was conducted on the child and the RN who conducted the examination stated although the injury appeared suspicious and unusual, she did not suspect any type of sexual abuse. Physician advised Police Detective that the injury was unique, and she was under the belief it could have been accidental. Based on the time C1 was picked up from the daycare and the time bleeding was identified by the parent, it is unclear the injury occurred at the daycare facility or at the child’s home.
This agency has investigated the complaint(s) alleging " Daycare child sustained a suspicious injury involving penetration." Based on the evidence obtained during the course of the investigation by IB, the Department has determined that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit Interview was conducted in Spanish with licensee, Guillermina Garcia. No deficiencies cited today.
THE NOTICE OF SITE VISIT WAS POSTED AS REQUIRED BY H&S CODE SEC. 1596.817. THE NOTICE OF SITE VISIT MUST REMAIN POSTED FOR 30 DAYS OR A CIVIL PENALTY OF $100.00 WILL APPLY.
|