Continued from LIC9099.
On the allegation facility staff demean resident’s dignity. During interview with RP it was stated that RP observed R1 going to the bathroom and the door was not closed. RP felt that staff should have closed behind R1. S1 stated R1 had a personal bathroom because she was the only resident at facility
On the allegation staff yelled at resident. During interview RP stated that R1 raised her voice but did not actually yell. RP also stated there was a male (unknown name) caregiver that would raise his voice. S1 stated that staff does not yell at any of the residents.
On the allegation staff do not meet resident’s hygienic care needs. During interview S1 stated that it was a couple of days before washing R1’s hair because S1 wanted R1 to get comfortable being at a new facility, but R1 was bathed every day. During interview with RP it was stated that pictures were sent ten (10) days later showing R1 had been showered. S1 stated that RP requested a picture of R1 in a towel. S1 would not comply with that request but agreed to send a picture of R1 fully clothed.
On the allegation facility bathroom is not clean. During interview with RP it was stated the bathroom was tidy, but the carpet had smudges. RP stated to LPA L. Hall that the bathroom was okay. S1 stated during interview that bathroom is cleaned every day. LPA observed bathroom to be sanitary.
LPA L. Hall was unable to interview any staff or residents due to the facility not in operation at the present time.
Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided. |