1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | ...continued from LIC9099
LPA interviewed two (2) Care Staff and two (2) Witnesses. After interviews were conducted and records were reviewed there was no documentation in the records or interviews that revealed the allegation, “Facility did not accept resident back after hospitalization”. On 09/06/22 S1 notified CCL of the change in C1's medical condition. A 30-day notice was submitted to CCL, RCEB and C1 on 09/06/22. The notice expired and no action was taken against C1. C1 was admitted to the hospital on 09/28/22 and needed treatment for unexplained weakness in his/her legs. Per the Nurse’s notes from the hospital on 09/30/22, C1 required total assistance of his/her ADL’s. Due to a change in C1’s medical condition, and needs and services, S1 was unable to accept C1 back to the facility and unable to provide the proper level of care for C1. RCEB’s assessment on 10/05/22 revealed that C1 will need alternative placement for intermediate care and rehabilitation. LPA interviewed W1 and RCEB currently has procedures in place to locate C1 to a facility for intermediate and post care. Per S1, the Puchase of Service from RCEB has been canceled.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided to Administrator, Dominique Mellion. |