1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continuation - Page 2 of 2 Complaint Investigation Report
When LPA interviewed S3, S3 stated that S3 there has been incidents once in a while where residents do have to wait for about an hour due to the need or assistance of prior resident’s service call. When LPA interviewed S4 and S5, both admitted it does take a long period of time to assist residents due to staffing. Both S4 and S5 stated that for a resident who need 2-person assist, there would be no available staff to assist the others. In addition, S4 and S5 stated that there have been multiple occurrences where one staff will provide care to a 2-person assistance resident and it will take longer to go assist another resident. When LPA interviewed 7 witnesses, 4 witnesses stated that they were independent and did not use the call button, 1 witness stated that staff does take a long time, and 2 stated that staff was able to come assist within a timely manner.
When LPA asked S1 for a pendant call log during the time of visit on March 3, 2020 and S1 stated that there has been a system reset due to erroneous messages. On August 19, 2020, LPA contacted S1 for pendant call log, S1 was not able to provide LPA a pendant call log. S1 wrote to LPA via email, “Our call notification system has not changed since your visit several months ago. This system’s primary functionality is to alert our caring staff that a resident requires assistance. A secondary function is that we are able to randomly spot check call response times. This allows us to follow up on anything that might appear outside of our accepted parameters. As the system is set-up, I am not able to print call logs.” On 09/23/2020, S1 provided LPA with current call button for the week of 09/16/2020 to 09/22/2020 but was not able to provide LPA with a log during the complaint period. Therefore, LPA has determined this allegation to be substantiated.
For the allegation, staff did not assist resident with her toileting needs in a timely manner. RP stated when R1 press the pendant call button for assistance for toileting needs, staff did not come assist R1 in a timely manner. Staff took about 45 minutes to 1 hours to assist R1. When LPA interviewed S3, S4, and S5, all staff did admit it does take a long period of time to assist residents. Therefore, this allegation is part of one for the incidents where staff took about 45 minutes to 1 hour to assist resident of toileting needs and R1 did not received assistance within a timely manner. The allegation above coincide with this allegation which it took 45 minutes to 1 hour for a staff to respond to a resident in their apartment for assistance. Therefore, LPA has found this allegation to be substantiated.
Based on LPA interviews conducted, and record reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
The following deficiency was observed and cited under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division & Chapter, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalties.
Exit interview conducted with Executive Director, Joyce Latimer. Appeal rights and copy of report sent via email in PDF format. |