1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA interviewed R1, R1 stated R1 does not recall the time frame of the event. R1 stated that nothing happened to R1. LPA interviewed S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, and S6 all indicated that they noticed that R1 memory have be declining alot and is on a lot of medication that might cause R1 to hallucinate. S6 stated that the polices officer spoke to S6 whom was investigating this incident indicated that he believes/ observed that R1 is hallucinating, because R1 is telling two different stories, and R1 doesn’t remembered.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided. |