1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | ...continued from LIC9099.
Interviews conducted with the ED, S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, W1, W2, W3, & W4 confirmed that emergency services were initiated for R1 to be transported to Alta Bates Medical Center in Berkeley, CA for a stage 3 to 4 pressure wound. S2 stated that on July 14, 2024 a nurse’s aide (S4) called the paramedics, R1 was on hospice, under hospice care, and was being transported for 1st aid; W2 was present. W4 stated that W1 and W2 were blindsided; W1 and W2 did not know that the facility would not allow R1 to return after treatment of the wound on 07/14/24. W1, R1’s Power of Attorney (POA), was not present and was out of the country at that time. W4 further stated that S2 outright refused to accept R1 back to the facility although R1 was under the care of hospice. With the efforts of W4, R1 was successfully placed at another Residential Care for the Elderly (RCFE) in Pinole, CA with the services of Sutter VNAH Alameda Hospice. S2 did not seek counsel for joint determination from the Community Care Licensing Department (CCLD), the resident, R1’s Power of Attorney (POA), the hospice agency, physician, and licensee to determine that R1’s continued retention at the facility would pose a health and safety risk. Based on interviews and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence for the violation has been met; therefore, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED.
Deficiencies cited from Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of correction by plan of correction due date, and any repeat violations within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties.
Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to ED.
|