1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Facility not accommodating client's family to arrange outings with client.
However, based on record review, LPAs observed facility are accommodating family members to take clients on outings. LPAs reviewed a sample of text from three client's family members making arrangements with S1 to take C1, C3, and C4 out. C1 stated C1 goes on outings and 4 of 4 staff stated C1, C2 and C3 are being taken out by family.
Allegation: Facility is not accommodating client's family to drop off items for client.
However, interview with C1 revealed C1's family relative dropped off food to C1. S2 confirmed C1's family relative dropped off food for C1.
Allegation: Facility failed to answer the phone in a timely manner.
However, based on interviews with 4 staff, 4 of 4 staff stated phones are answered promptly unless it indicates on the caller ID that it is a spam call. If clients are not available to receive a call, staff will take a message and write it on the whiteboard located in the kitchen next to the landline. 3 of 4 staff stated they give the message to clients. On 3/29/2022, LPAs observed a message for C1 to call a family relative every Friday as a reminder.
Allegation: Facility is not allowing visitors
However, based on record review, facility has been allowing visitation since March 2021. 2 of 2 clients stated they are allowed to have visitors.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. |