It was alleged that staff failed to safeguard resident's (R1) personal belongings. It was reported that staff stole R1’s belongings.
During interview, R1 indicated that staff (S1) took and swapped S1’s airPod with his. R1 stated that he wants his airPod back; however, when further interviewed, R1 stated he put S1’s airPod back to S1’s backpack.
Staff (S1 and S2) were interviewed. S1 denied taking R1’s airPod and stated that his airPod is Apple brand while R1’s is a cheaper version and R1 wanted his. S1 stated R1 took S1’s airPod. S2 indicated R1 does not have airPod but has the cheaper brand.
R1’s family member (FM) was also interviewed and indicated R1 has airPod that R1 may have misplaced and that staff will never steal it. Two individuals (W1 and W2) who has known and come in direct contact with R1 indicated they have not seen R1 with airPod.
Residents (R2, R3 and R4) stated they never lost any of their personal belongings.
Based on the information gathered, the allegation is closed as unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
No citation issued.
Exit interview conducted and copy of this report provided to Lilibeth Toco. |