1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Resident had an altercation with another resident in the home – Unfounded
The Department has investigated this allegation and per record review and interviews found that R1 was referred by Family Home Agency (FHA) which was contracted with the Mentor Network. R1’s social worker W1 had no knowledge that the facility had been licensed by CCL, and W1 moved R1 to an appropriate facility. R2 was a non-resident who was found to be a general renter of the facility. It had been alleged that R2 had been subjected to an assault by R1, however, it has been found that neither individual was jurisdictional to CCLD.
Staff spoke inappropriately to resident – Unfounded
The Department has investigated this allegation and per record review and interviews found that R2 (subject to this complaint) was a general renter and not an admission to the licensed facility. Staff denied speaking inappropriately to R2 with no witnesses identified, and R2 was not jurisdictional to CCLD.
Staff did not safeguard resident’s personal property – Unfounded
The Department has investigated this allegation and per record review and interviews found that R2 (subject to this complaint) was a general renter and not an admission to the licensed facility. Staff denied holding any personal belongings of R2, none were found at the facility during investigation, and there were no identified witnesses – in addition to R2 not being jurisdictional to CCLD.
Staff left residents unattended – Unfounded
The Department has investigated this allegation and per record review and interviews found that R2 (subject to this complaint) was a general renter and not an admission to the licensed facility. The facility was under no obligation to supervise R2, and R2 was not jurisdictional to CCLD.
Staff yelled at residents – Unfounded
The Department has investigated this allegation and per record review and interviews found that while staff denied yelling at the residents – with no identified witnesses – R2 (subject to this complaint) and R1 were not jurisdictional to CCLD.
Continue on LIC9099-C (page 2) |