1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 4/23/24, the LPA interviewed R1 and R2, who stated that per the contract generated by the previous Licensee, 24-hour a day security service was on site in the outer lobby area and that the only times a guard wasn’t at the station were during rounds. R1 further stated that shortly following the sale, the new owners had untrained persons serving as “security” stationed at reception; and that the outer front door had been “unlocked” and other persons had been able to access the facility due to the lack of security. On same day, LPA interviewed R3 who stated feeling unsafe; and interviewed R4, who also stated that vehicles in the parking lot had been vandalized & burglarized, that the front door had been unsecured, the garage door has not closed properly since September of 2023, and that resident safety is a concern. R4 also stated that before the sale, a security guard was present who would have to allow visitors access into the facility.
Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, and the Department has determined that the facility is not adhering to existing CCRC contracts as required by the California Department of Justice per terms of sale to the current licensee – by removing the 24-hour security provided for in the CCRC contracts. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Failure to correct deficiencies by POC due date may result in additional Civil Penalties.
Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.
LIC9099-C (Page 3) |