1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff did not ensure resident’s call button was not in disrepair
Investigation Finding: Substantiated
During investigation, LPA D Panlilio interviewed reporting party (RP), resident (R1), staff (ED, S1, S2, S5) and reviewed R1’s documents. On 04/23/26, staff (S1, S2) confirmed with LPA that they did not test the emergency call button issued to R1 during the onboarding process on 03/27/26 to ensure it was operational. R1 pressed the emergency call button around 5PM the same day and was unable to reach staff for assistance for over 3 hours (5PM to 8:15PM) due to a non-operating emergency call button. R1 stated she was left in the dark, was unable to transfer from her wheelchair to the bed and did not have her meal during this time. Based on LPA’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation that staff did not ensure residents call buttons were not in disrepair was found to be substantiated.
Allegation: Staff inappropriately took resident’s medication
Investigation Finding: Substantiated
During investigation, LPA D Panlilio interviewed reporting party (RP), resident (R1), staff (ED, S1, S5) and reviewed R1’s documents. On 04/01/26, POA/RP sent an email approving staff medication management for R1. On 04/03/26, he rescinded the approval via email. On 04/07/26, staff confirmed with LPA that they took R1’s medications despite the 04/03/26 email stating that R1 does not require medication management. Her medications were returned before 7PM on 04/07/26 as requested by POA. Based on LPA’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation that staff inappropriately took resident’s medication was found to be substantiated.
Continued on next page, LIC 9099-C pg2
|